Category Archives: Uncategorized

Long Island’s Continued Fight Against Opioid Abuse (Pastoral Thoughts)

Recently I had the opportunity to meet with a few concerned and diligent community organizers/ social workers in regards to Project Safety Net ( This was a follow-up and review of a previous meeting I had not attended, however I was encouraged and impressed with work that is on the horizon.

  • Discussions regarding the National Emergency Opioid Grant provided by the Department of Labor were had. Also, talk about the Drug-Free Community Grant was had as well. These are great resources and opportunity for those engaged in the fight against opioid abuse. More information and utilization of these grants are surely necessary.
  • These need for a community-based structure and network was encouraged rather than overly administrative.
  • Taking notice that we met the evening of an early LI-CAN training on May 23rd demonstrates the continued struggle of the various efforts in the fight against opioids on Long Island to properly coordinate and be aware of the various efforts happening around us. Prayerfully, we can work on better working together.
  • It was marked out that a big part of our right is to respond to the issue that many on Long Island “have nothing to do”. Therefore many feel “marooned”. A lack of mobility, lack of a healthy culture and environments that are organic and natural, and a lack authentic-relation mentoring are all contributing factors to drug-abuse on Long Island. We must be creatively thinking – what can be done?


As I sat through the meeting, listening intently and enjoying the details brought forth, I did what each of us responsibly engaged in the fight should be doing. I began to examine my work (past-present-future) in these regards. Here are some thoughts that were discussed and/or were in my head throughout the meeting.

My current focal points:

  • My ministerial work and presence at The Blue Point Bible Church ( has allowed for a continued “making known the manifold wisdom of God (Eph. 3:10)” in an effort to demolish strongholds (including but surely not limited to drug-abuse). As a responsible pastor, I have continued to engage the church and secular community about the need to bring healing to the devastating disease of addiction and those who suffer from and because of it.  Also, we allow to building to be used for the hosting of Heroin Anonymous.
  •  As a member of the Blue Point Community Civic Association ( I have worked with and assisted our civic president and board in engaging county officials, school district administration, and community members about the need for rezoning to be analyzed regarding the need for rehabilitation facilities on Long Island. The BPCCA continues to work for the advancement of proper consideration in these regards.
  •  I have worked with LI-CAN (Long Island – Congregations, Associations, and Neighborhoods) to continue to foster awareness and healing by collaborative community efforts including every person possible.

Other efforts and plans:

#ProjectRESTORE & The XD Movement – Both of these efforts aim to exemplify the beauty of restored and extremely different lives. Through various efforts such as weekly self-examination and mentoring, planning clean up, and other fun activities, we seek to see the answers to our prayers.

Dorothy Johnson, through her effort Maxxed Out Prevention continues to plan and participate in events. One was mentioned for September 25th (more information to  be provided soon).

Therese Bertsch mentioned Taizé prayer as an opportunity to bless and heal others. Consideration of church and secular opportunities to host should be considered.

Also, discussion was had about a possible activity/effort such as a bonfire, boating trip, hiking, or something of the like to be hosted on August 31st – International Overdose Awareness Day.


Kind Regards,
Michael Miano, pastor
The Blue Point Bible Church


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

5.29 – Beyond Creation Science (Pt. 5)

In this video and outline, we review chapters 4-6 of Beyond Creation Science. See the video at the following link,


Beyond Creation Science
Chapter 4 -The End Of A Covenant World

The “Last Days” Of What? 

“…the last days were a contemporary reality during the New Testament times”.
cf. Acts 2:14-17; Hebrews 1:1-2; Jude 17-19; 1 John 2:18, 26

“…If the last days were back then, how is it possible that we are still around? Obviously the world did not end in the first century”. (pg. 70)\


The “End” Of What?

“…how would devout Jews, who knew their Old Testament well. Understand apostolic references to the “end”?”  cf. Deuteronomy 32:20; Matthew 24:3; 1 Corinthians 10:11; 1 Peter 4:7


The Focus of Prophecy

“Prophecy is primarily concerned with the redemption of God’s people”.  


The Elements Will Melt


The “Heavens and Earth”


According To His Promise


Symphonic Unity in Biblical Prophecy


Beyond Creation Science 
Chapter 5 – The Divide: 1830 

Geology and Christianity

The Problem for Darwin: Geology

The Rise of Intelligent Design 


Lyell – Cornerstone or Capstone of Geology? 


The Coincidence of Geology and Theology


The Other Capstone Event of 1830 


The 1830 Synchronicity 



Beyond Creation Science
Chapter 6 – Worlds Collide: Lyell & Darby

The Liberalism/ Fundamentalism Context



The Dominant Old Earth View



The Premillennial Source of Flood Geology



Covering the Tracks



Premillennialism Applied to Genesis



Premillennial Philosophy of History



Premillennialism & Youth- Earth Creationism



The Contemporary Dilemma



Review Historical Charts on pgs. 91 & 110

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized


A vital question that must be asked when talking about eschatology, the study of the “end times”, is “the end of what?”. Rather than Scripture explaining an end to the “world” (as unfortunately many English translations have erroneously translated), what Scripture does point to is the “end of the age”. In my recent debate with Sam Frost (May 2019), he posited that we have not yet seen the judgement of the “wheat and the tares” as was told by Jesus Christ to happen at the end of the age (cf. Matt. 13:39).

I will be offering up a post-debate review in days to come, and of course I am appreciative to those who have already begun offering reviews and comments. However, I would like to highlight how it is that Sam Frost, in his new interpretive matrix, has failed to follow the Biblical narrative of “end of the age judgement” and how we today are to be properly placed within the larger metanarrative. I have also written about this many times before lamenting how many Christian perspectives, especially end times views, fail to consider narrative and metanarrative theology.

In the debate, Sam charged that the “wheat and tares judgement has not happened”, and followed that with “have the wicked been uprooted?” (***Although, he does make some confusing comments about the “wrath of God” and displays confusion on how the Day of the Lord relates to the details found in 1 Thessalonians chapters 4-5 during the Q&A).


When was the “end of the age”?

If we read the Gospel of Matthew and mark out the mentions of the “end of the age”, we can follow the parabolic details of Matthew chapter 13 (“Wheat and Tares”) to Matthew chapters 23-24. In Matthew chapter 23 we read the context of the judgement that would come upon Jerusalem and it’s leaders, “That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed UPON THE EARTH (Matt. 23:35)” and we are given a time “All these things shall come upon this generation (Matt. 23:36). Furthermore, as we move into Matthew chapter 24, we find the disciples equating these things – the judgement of all the righteous blood shed upon earth – with the “sign of His coming” and the “end of the age” (cf. Matthew 24:3).

A great study on the Two-Age view understood by the Hebrews can be found at the following link,


In his book, Kingdom Come: Messiah’s Methodical Manifesto Hidden in His Parables, T.J. Smith writes, “The phrases, ‘this age’ and ‘the age to come’ have their roots in the ancient Hebrew expectations of the Messiah. They anticipated and expected their Mosaic era (the age when the Law of Moses ruled) to be replaced with the coming of the Messiah A.K.A. The Messianic age. The Jews of Yeshua’s day were living in the ‘this age’ (Mosaic) but were looking for the day when Messiah would come and transfer them into the ‘age to come’ (cf. Hebrews 9:8)”. He also cites Bible scholar N.T. Wright in talking about the text I mentioned above, Matthew chapter 24, “One of the main reasons I suppose, why the OBVIOUS WAY of reading the chapter has been ignored for so long must be THE FACT that in a good deal of Christian theology the fall of Jerusalem has had no theological significance. This has meant that not only that Mark 13 is found puzzling, but also all the references to the same event elsewhere in the gospels – EVEN WHEN IT STARES ONE IN THE FACE, as in Luke 13:1-5 – have been read as general warnings of hellfire in an afterlife, rather than the literal and physical DIVINE JUDGEMENT through Roman judgement that we have seen to be characteristic of Jesus’ story”.

I believe at this point you might see why dealing with Sam Frost’s “logic” and new matrix of interpretation can indeed be confusing. Not only is he wrong, but he knows much of this stuff, as I sought to make clear by citing some of his early, now renounced, works.


What happened in AD 70?

All throughout the Scriptures, God sought to make His kingdom known. I mentioned that in the beginning of the debate as a sort of outline to the narrative (cf. Duet. 4:5-9; Isaiah 26:18 ; Romans 8:20-21; Galatians 3:19; Ephesians 1:9-11). What is revealed through the New Testament verses is that it would be in and through Jesus Christ and the “Body of His Fullness, the church”, that would be revealed as the goal, that would bring forth His Kingdom.

If we follow the narrative appropriately and in context, we can discern that judgement was coming upon the Jews because in their carnality they impeded the progress of God’s kingdom. The 1st century Jews were “all that offend, and them who do iniquity” (Cf. Matt. 13:41). The gathering and burning of that wicked generation should remind the Bible reader of a couple chapters early where John the Baptist used such language toward that generation as well (cf. Matt. 3:10-12). Also, the Reformation Study Bible correlates all of these texts, just in case the common accusation toward FP is used that these verses should not be connected, “…the language of Matthew 24:31 is parallel to passages like Matthew 13:41; 16:27; 25:31…”.

Also, a great read on the Parable of the Tares and the Wheat can be found at the following link,


Sam continued to emphasize the word “world” in many texts in an odd attempt to universalize the details found therein. I briefly highlighted that confusion in the debate. The Greek word ‘kosmos’ that has been translated as ‘world’ in many verses does not necessarily mean planet, but means ‘something that has been ordered or designed’. Many Biblical texts do not make sense if we try to universalize the word ‘kosmos’. For example;

Matthew 4:8 – Surely Jesus didn’t see the entire globe from the top of a mountain, right?

Matthew 5:14 – Can a city light the entire ‘world’ in the universalized sense, or is their context to this?

John 1:10 – Jesus did not venture into the entire planet.

Romans 1:8 – it would be historical impossible that the faith of the church at Rome (by early AD 50’s 60’s) was heard upon throughout the entire planet.

As I mentioned in the debate, the ‘world’ that was passing away, and coming under judgement, as per the context expressed them and herein, is the Old Covenant world (cf. 1 Corinthians 7:31; Hebrews 8:13).


So what was the result of this judgement?

As Jesus affirms in Matt. 13:43, which is a citation of Daniel 12:3, “Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the Kingdom of their Father…”. This is the Full Preterist reality. This is what men who by their “doctrines of men” are calling heresy. At the  “scattering of the power of the holy people” (cf. Dan. 12:7) the dead were raised (cf. Dan. 12:1-2) and judgement were brought forth, and this was the time of the end (cf. Dan. 12:9) – The end of the age. That time established the ‘fullness’ of what was expected by the Old Covenant saints, and how they with the Church, would come into that reality (cf. Hebrews 11:39-40). Then, today, and forever, we Christians can reflect Christ’s glory by expressing the fruits of the Spirit  and the “goal of our instruction (cf. 1 Tim. 1:5) by knowing His “faithfulness and mercy” (cf. Romans 15:8-9).

I do hope indeed this mighty clarify some of the points Sam made rather confusing the other evening. If and when edified, glorify God!

Michael Miano, pastor
The Blue Point Bible Church

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

4.17 – Beyond Creation Science (Pt. 4)

Here is the link to the review video done by Pastor Michael Miano for this chapter’s study,


Chapter 3 – When Did This Happen?

Coming On The Clouds


The Right Question


What We Should Expect


Setting The Scene


There Shall be False Prophets


Increase of Lawlessness & Decadence


There Shall Be Wars & Rumors of Wars


Famines & Earthquakes


Persecution & Death


The Abomination of Desolation


If Those Days Had Not Been Cut Short


The Flood, Sodom, and Jerusalem


Signs & Wonders

The Destruction of Jerusalem

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Church as the Deposit of His Life

Recently, I watched a Facebook live video on a page “Prove All Things”. These men had been talking about the consummation of God’s kingdom and His presence when I chimed in with some thoughts regarding “Full Preterism” and how such proper understanding of eschatology helps better understand the New Covenant. I have provided short clips of the video found in the links below.

First, the teacher on the video offer the challenge, “If the Lord returned after His death in the first century, do you today take the Lord’s Supper?” and citing “We are to observe His death, burial, and resurrection until the Lord comes” (cf. 1 Corinthians 11:25-26 ). I totally appreciated the challenge that “If we are going to be consistent about it, let’s be consistent” and this man is totally correct in such assertion. So, if the Apostles and the other Christians (such as the Corinthian Church) were “filling up the measure of Christ’s suffering” (as the Body of Christ) cf. 2 Corinthians 4:12; Colossians 1:24 – as their proclamation of “His death”, and the Pharisees and Christ-rejecting Jews were “filling up the measure of their fathers” (cf. Matthew 23:32), when would such measurement come to an end? As the Preterist asserts, at the end of the age, which would signified by the destruction of Jerusalem, namely the temple – “the power of the holy people (cf. Matthew 24:3; Daniel 12:7)

Link # 1 –

Many have sought to use this “Lord’s Supper debacle” to go against the truth of Fulfilled Bible Prophecy, however all it does it reveal a lack of understanding the “telos” and the consummated “one hope”. For example, in this next clip the teacher chides my response that the goal that would be attained (“longing fulfilled”) at the coming of the Lord was that His Church would “become a deposit of His Life”. He remarked, “Where are you getting that from?”

Link # 2 –

Please allow me to explain and show where I am getting that from.

To make something a deposit is defined as “placement or storage especially for safekeeping  or as a pledge”. When we study the Biblical narrative, we learn that Old Covenant Israel (“flesh and blood”) carried “the death”, which was their demeaned relationship of God due to their constant innate idolatry. In other words, we might say that Old Covenant Israel, under the “flesh and blood” covenant became a deposit of “covenant death” or “fellowship death”. This is the death highlighted in the Garden of Eden, lamented by the prophetic Hosea (cf. Hosea 6:7), and promised deliverance from by the prophet Isaiah (cf. Isaiah 25:8 and chapter 65). The New Testament details that those that died to the “flesh and blood” system by accepting Christ as Lord and Savior, carried His death rather than “the death” within them. His death was producing Life (cf. John 12:24-25; Hebrews 12:2) and that would be shown through all the consummating work of Jesus Christ (ultimately up until His coming, or “Parousia” which means “presence”) cf. Hebrews 9:28. The goal of the coming was for Christ to demonstrate His presence with the saints – past, present, and future through the Church (cf. John 14:1-23; 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17; 1 Corinthians 15:21-28, 50-58; Hebrews chapter 11:39-40; Revelation chapters 14 and 21-22).

It is rather depressing that so many have been led down the path of a “deferred hope”, waiting for someday in the future to be the fulfillment of God’s presence with His people. And while the Full Preterist framework does bring with it a complete paradigm shift and necessary study to “rightly divide the Word of truth” (cf. 2 Timothy 2:15), we can surely praise God that the application of such a shift in our theology, is rather than waiting for “the day”, we celebrate His presence today, noting the Church as the deposit of His Life.

The last proof text I will mention is Ephesians 1:20-23, wherein we read,  “That which He brought about in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And He put all things in subjection under His feet, and gave Him as head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all.”

Yes, Christ’s resurrection was a “sign” (which He called it Himself in Matthew 12: 38-45) to demonstrate His faithfulness, mercy, and power that would be demonstrated in and through His Church. In Christ, those who are dead find life, and the dead ones are put in right standing (otherwise known as the “resurrection of the dead”), and the focal point of the covenant is no longer a mortal body (“flesh and blood”/ OC Israel), but rather is based upon the Spirit of Christ as found in and through His Glorified body (the Church) – “the fulness of Him who fills all and all”.

Listen to my “Resurrection Sunday” sermon for more on how this beautiful picture is painted through the Biblical narrative. Here is the link,

Glory to God For His Goodness,
Pastor Michael Miano


*** Here are some other Biblical tends that lend more support to the understand that the Holy Spirit was given as a deposit to guarantee Christ’s presence in and through His Church (which was completed at His Parousia):

“…set his seal of ownership on us, and put his Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come. – 2 Corinthians 1:2

“Now the one who has fashioned us for this very purpose is God, who has given us the Spirit as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come. – 2 Cor 5:5

“…who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory. – Ephesians 1:14

“For which cause also I suffer these things; but I am not ashamed; for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep for that day the deposit I have entrusted to him…By the Holy Spirit who dwells within us, guard the good deposit entrusted to you. – 2 Tim 1:12- 14

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

4.10 – Beyond Creation Science (PT. 3)

Here is a link to the video review for our study through Chapter 2 of Beyond Creation Science,

4/10 – Wednesday Night Praise, Prayer, & Bible Study
Beyond Creation Science – Chapter 2

– Praise & Prayer
– Discussion regarding reading through Chapters 2
– Outline Discussion
– Conclusion
– Closing Prayer

Chapter 2 – Time Is Running Out

The Proper Frame of Reference

The Disciples Followed The Master

Initial Expectation


Near-ing Expectation


Near-er Expectation


Near-est Expectation


Revelation: John’s Olivet Discourse





Chapter 3 – When Did This Happen?

Coming On The Clouds


The Right Question


What We Should Expect


Setting The Scene


There Shall be False Prophets


Increase of Lawlessness & Decadence


There Shall Be Wars & Rumors of Wars


Famines & Earthquakes


Persecution & Death


The Abomination of Desolation


If Those Days Had Not Been Cut Short


The Flood, Sodom, and Jerusalem


Signs & Wonders

The Destruction of Jerusalem


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Video & Outline Response to Aaron Tyler’s “Escape from Preterism” Interview

Here is a link to the YouTube video going through and explaining the below outline,


Recently, a man named Aaron Erhdman did an interview with Andrew White on “Open The Doors Radio” wherein he detailed his “escape from Preterism”. What I would like to do in this critique of that interview is offer some perspective and insights that will demonstrate the blatant nonsense spewed by both Aaron and the interview host.

At the beginning of the interview, Aaron goes on to define Preterism as “the idea that Jesus’s 2nd coming happened in AD 70, as did the fulfillment of the new heavens and new earth was set up, and the resurrection”. This statement is right, however Aaron clearly does not realize that within Church History many scholars have admitted portions of that statement, either the coming, the new heavens and new earth, or the resurrection as prophesied by the prophets HAS indeed happened.  Here are some links you can review to see evidence of this;


Aaron, as many who critique Full Preterism often try to do, goes about asserting the Church Fathers as if they are a united front in regards to many areas of theology, especially eschatology. This is patently false. Consider the following statements that prove this. Also, none of these people were FP’s therefore were not trying to provide support for my position, yet there statements further make my case.

“I am shocked at the number of people who want to fashion their theology around the Church Fathers. One can find in their confusing writings the full spectrum of views from baptismal regeneration, infant baptism, and other heretical teachings. The Church Fathers do not determine doctrine! A sound study of the Word of God determines our doctrine”. – Mal Couch, Founder & 1st President of Tyndale Theological Seminary

“Most of what the Church Fathers wrote remains untranslated—218 Latin and 166 Greek volumes—therefore, we cannot be dogmatic in asserting what the early Church Fathers believed.” – Gary DeMar

“Vespasian vanquished the Jews in the first year of his reign, bringing the number of years to a total of fiftytwo, plus six months. For he ruled for eleven years, and so by the date of his storming Jerusalem, the Jews had completed the seventy weeks foretold by Daniel.” – Tertullian, 3rd century church father

“The Irish Book of Questions on the Gospels, interpreted Christ’s coming in the clouds in Matthew 24:30 as “in the armies of the Romans.” It then interpreted the angels in verse 31 as avenging angels “who are present in the Romans.” On the parable of the fig tree, the Book of Questions reads, Learn the parable from the fig tree, which is told about the Roman captivity. The parable contains these things. The fig tree was full of leaves but had little fruit. So also were the Jews in that glorious time, but few of them were elect. On them summer came, that is, fire burning their city.” – Gary DeMar

“And the Gospel of the Kingdom will be preached in all the world, and then the end shall come (Matthew 24:14). The Gospel, then, in a short time was preached in the whole world [Col. 1:6, 23], for a witness to the heathen, and Barbarians and Greeks alike possessed the writings about Jesus in their ancestral script and language” – Eusebius, 4th century church father

“I need now only say, all these things have been done : the old and elementary system passed away with a great noise : all these predicted empires have actually fallen, and the new kingdom, the new heaven and earth, the new Jerusalem — all of which were to descend from God, to be formed by His power, have been realized on earth.” Eusebius (c. 265 – 340), Bishop of Caesarea and “Father of Church History”


Building a “strawman”, of false characture of something, is often a method used when someone wants to go about dishonestly attacking another view or perspective. Aaron has sought to build up this image of him being a FP and then escaping. He asserted, “Preterist’s don’t believe in Spiritual warfare”. That’s strange – most FP including myself would surely say we do. 2 Corinthians 10 gives us the foundation of our warfare. I have preached on this. It surely doesn’t seem that Aaron ever came to fully understand Full Preterism, nor did he “escape”. The whole nonsense story, which I am sure grabbed the hearts and minds of some, is complete nonense. It would seem that Aaron battles with depression on his own terms, and rather than Spiritual leaders helping him do so, many are content to foster his confusion for there benefit (like making mocking interview radio programs). Aaron says Full Preterism leads to “
no hope”, which is a complete failure to understand how Hebrew Spirituality works – namely how individual future hopes are built upon passed fulfilled hopes. Proverbs 13:12 expresses this beautifully; “Delayed hope makes the heart sick, but fulfilled desire is a tree of life”


I’d like to touch a bit on the strange dishonesty and nastiness of character revealed by Andy White. He specifically said he doesn’t interact with Preterists because it’s silly to do so, he said – “Just a simple perusal through Scripture” and his mocking “Is water wet?”. So the many who have come to understand Full Preterism are just fools that can’t read? Thank God these guys show up with such clarity, because the church does seem rather divided on this and history seems to favor confusion on eschatological matters rather than how simply “is water wet” might sound. Andy asserts he believes  in the “Judeo-Christian hope of the resurrection”, which I would say I do, and his view is lacking, but notice also how he uses the obscure, a text often cited by scholars to be problematic and difficult to properly translate, to bolster his view –  Job 19. Andy is seems you are intentionally dumbing yourself, and attempting to do so to others, is favor of your view.

I had come across a video teaching of Andy’s, or Andrew White on Facebook, back in April 2018. After listening to his program I wrote this comment to him, and of course, never received a response (at least he is consistent with his not interacting with Preterists (which is also clear from his confusion regarding what Preterists believe- yet he knows its wrong, lol – please laugh with me). Anyway, here is what I had written to him:

Firstly, I’d like to commend and appreciate your passion my brother. I enjoyed your points about fighting for the truth and surely share sentiments about how many have “divorced from the truth”, sadly many within Christendom.

You spoke a bit about “authentic Biblical preaching” and the willingness to be offensive for the sake of His truth. That is another thing I can surely agree with you upon. I am looking to start a group soon enough to gather pastors who actually want to talk about doctrine (despite the many differences we may have). There really is such a need.

That brings me to my next point. You cited 2 Thessalonians 2:3 and Revelation 2:4 in a manner that seemed you believe we are in those days. I refer you back to your point about “authentic Biblical preaching”. Are you aware of the proper interpretation of Scripture and the use of “audience relevance”. How can we argue we are still in the times the 1st century Thessalonian church was in, or the 7 churches of Asia Minor in revelation. This “Futurism Gone Wild” has obscured the Truth in many areas and needs to be dealt with. I have labored in that regard for years.

I’m hoping you might consider this and maybe we can grab a coffee sometime and talk through more Biblical doctrine.”

Of course he wouldn’t repond. SMH

Back to Aaron who has supposedly written up a “list of reasons” why Preterism is not Christianity and is “absolutely a cult”. Well thank God for Aaron coming on the scene, huh? (Prayerfully you can understand my sarcasm and rather lament this young man’s arrogance with me). He goes on to say there is no history of FP before 1970, and makes remarks that one can find people have leveled against Full Preterism for years. Again, I believe I have made the point about the lack of a clear and consistent eschatology in Church History, so further reforms no matter when they show up in Church History should be examined by Scripture, not argued by way of councils, creeds, quotes, and confession. Do we not remember the words of the beloved 15th century reformer, Martin Luther?

“Since your most serene majesty and your lordships require of me a simple, clear and direct answer, I will give one, and it is this: Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures and by clear reason (for I do not trust in the pope or councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted. My conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not retract anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise. God help me. Amen.”

Aaron also states that the Full Preterist view has “not one true scholar” and then falsifies his own point by stating Sam Frost as the scholar. Was this Aaron’s ignorant attempt to discredit and attack the Full Preterist movement and asserting there are none with accredited degrees that hold to and/or teach the view? That would be strange, and would not only show Aaron’s lack of information on the many that hold to the view and would reveal, which should already be evident, that Aaron’s knowledge on Full Preterism, the movement, the teachers is rudimentary at best, otherwise completely misinformed. What does all of this matter, I have no idea, just used to bolster to his attack on and again a misinformed “knowledge” of honorary degrees. As many have said after watching the video, “a young man trying to make a name for himself by attacking others”.


The little bit of Scripture that was brought up on the show was Aaron’s assertions on “bodily resurrection”. It’s clear that Aaron’s dogmatic assertions are not his own, as his lack of study in this regard is evident, as it would seem he just borrows different details from Scripture and theology to bolster his points without actual study. For example, and I will provide some links below, there have been various disagreements in the Church Fathers and the Christian Church (even within the Full Preterist community) regarding the resurrection of the dead – not this false unified front. Also, the fact that many within Church History saw it as necessary to write up teachings on it in great length, I think of Athenagorus of Athens, demonstrates that there were various understandings and needs for clarity (which unfortunately many time came from theological distinctions and nuances of the writer).
Arguments over “resurrection of the flesh”, “resurrection of the body”, etc. are found all throughout the history of the Church.

Yet Aaron goes about citing his “clarity” on this topic and using passages such as 1 Corinthians chapter 15 and Romans 7-8. Interestingly enough, I have many teachings on these passages, among other Full Preterist teachers, and once we prove our case, we are usually just buffeted with creeds and conffessions from Church History, not honest, simple, and natural reading of the text. Aaron states that the confusion regarding the“Body of death”  is found in Romans 8. “Romans 8 solves Romans 7”.

Let’s look at the text.  This first century letter to the Church at Rome.

Study Resources:
Aaron goes on to cite ridiculous “implications”, that are only true according to his paradigm:
– if resurrection is in the past, no place for us (allusions to IO)
– In a futurist and individual ways asserts that God will redeem His creation; “mortal body”
– cites passages such as Daniel 12; Acts 24 – all over the place, lol
– tries to correlate FP with Sadducees; Preterists deny the “power of God”
– Go on to demonstrate confusion with his host regarding – “Philetus and Hymenaus”; “What was Paul saying” – Matthew 27?> lol
– Brings in divergent doctrines such as Hell; Covenant Creation; “In Adam”
– Ignorantly asserts FP’s believe that sin and death have been there since the beginning (many views not just FP have seem and demonstrated this)

Aaron’s arrogance (and his host’s as well) continues as he moves into the following points:

FP’s are not in touch with reality; “What reality are they living in”
– “If this present world is the fulfillment, we were sold a bill of goods”. The world is getting “worse and worse”, “more and more evil”. – Andy White

Even attached Biblical teachers such as Gary Demar and Kenneth Gentry “partial preterists”
– We are NOT in the age to come – oh ok Aaron. lol
– 43 minutes in, they talk about the “ages” – they clearly looked confused; “Lack of Logicness”


“I haven’t found a view that is perfect”
Andy White says, “When it comes to eschatology we have to remain open”; Daniel didn’t understand; Aaron piggybacks that with “There is a lot we do not know”. ; “We can not allow difference of opinion on basic things such as the resurrection” – Andy White

“My question for them is, what changed in AD 70”. – Aaron Erhdman

Well let’s see. Voices from scholars and church history regarding what happened and thus changed in AD 70.

“No matter what view of eschatology we embrace, we must take seriously the redemptive-historical importance of Jerusalem’s destruction in A.D.70.” (R.C. Sproul, Last Days According to Jesus, 26)

Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by the prophet: “I will take away from them the voice of joy and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, the scent of myrrh, and the light of a lamp, and the whole land shall be destroyed” [Jer. 25:10]. For the whole service of the law has been abolished from them, and henceforth and forever they remain without a feast.” (St. Athanasius, Letters [vi]

“It is, in fact, a sign and notable proof of the coming of the Word that Jerusalem no longer stands” – Athanasius

“For I will ask them, Did He send the prophets and wise men? Did they slay them in their synagogue? Was their house left desolate? Did all the vengeance come upon that generation? It is quite plain that it was so, and no man gainsays it.” (Homily LXXIV) – Chrystrom

“When, then, we see what was of old foretold for the nations fulfilled in our own day, and when the lamentation and wailing that was predicted for the Jews, and the burning of the Temple and its utter desolation, can also be seen even now to have occurred according to the prediction, surely we must also agree that the King who was prophesied, the Christ of God, has come, since the signs of His coming have been shewn in each instance I have treated to have been clearly fulfilled.” (Demonstratio Evangelica (Proof of the Gospel) ;  BOOK VIII) – Eusbius

“If any one compares the words of our Saviour with the other accounts of the historian (Josephus) concerning the whole war, how can one fail to wonder, and to admit that the foreknowledge and the prophecy of our Saviour were truly divine and marvelously strange.” (Book III, Ch. VII) – Eusebius

“Since, then, the law originated with Moses, it terminated with John as a necessary consequence. Christ had come to fulfil it: wherefore “the law and the prophets were” with them “until John.”(2) And therefore Jerusalem, taking its commencement from David,(3) and fulfilling its own times, must have an end of legislation(4) when the new covenant was revealed.” – Irenaus

Origen (2nd Century)

“I challenge anyone to prove my statement untrue if I say that the entire Jewish nation was destroyed less than one whole generation later on account of these sufferings which they inflicted on Jesus. For it was, I believe, forty-two years from the time when they crucified Jesus to the destruction of Jerusalem.” (Contra Celsum, 198-199) – Origen

“It is no exaggeration to say that the Fall of Jerusalem is the most significant national event in the history of the world.” (B.F. Dunelm, The Arch of Titus and the spoils of the temple (1896))


To bring all of this to a conclusion and thus urge your further study, I will make a few last remarks. Aaron has not led anyone out of Full Preterism. So his posturing himself as such is DISHONEST. Aaron seemingly expresses agreement with Andy White in everything, yet one wonders is that the cause. Are they really so CONFUSED as to divide Matthew 24:3 into 3 questions, therefore making it inconsistent with the correlating texts found in Mark 13 and Luke 21?

Consider the beneficial sermon by Pastor David Curtis of Berean Bible Church.

All the mocking, strange giggling and patting each other their backs, and making foolish assertions simply reveals these men’s IMMATURITY in the Word and in character. May we desire to move away from dishonest, confused, and immature perspectives and desire to express diligence in study as 2 Timothy 2:15 urges us.

“Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.”


Here are some other links I came across studying for this presentation that may be beneficial to your study on these matters:








Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized